Comments on: Cambrian House vs TechCrunch: Is Crowdsourcing Dead? http://www.crowdsourcethis.com/2008/05/12/cambrian-house-vs-techcrunch-is-crowdsourcing-dead/ All Things Crowdsourcing Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:31:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Heldrazagine http://www.crowdsourcethis.com/2008/05/12/cambrian-house-vs-techcrunch-is-crowdsourcing-dead/#comment-45 Heldrazagine Wed, 14 May 2008 17:39:33 +0000 http://www.crowdsourcethis.com/2008/05/12/cambrian-house-vs-techcrunch-is-crowdsourcing-dead/#comment-45 "Sounds like another flip a dead company into a new one at a fraction theinvestment and pretend that it was a legitimate exit." @john: That's because that's exactly what it is. And since Paul P. was on the payroll and in fact spending a lot of time at CH during Mob4Hire's development, I would say it's a fair statement that CH's investors basically funded Mob4Hire's creation. “Sounds like another flip a dead company into a new one at a fraction theinvestment and pretend that it was a legitimate exit.”

@john: That’s because that’s exactly what it is. And since Paul P. was on the payroll and in fact spending a lot of time at CH during Mob4Hire’s development, I would say it’s a fair statement that CH’s investors basically funded Mob4Hire’s creation.

]]> By: john http://www.crowdsourcethis.com/2008/05/12/cambrian-house-vs-techcrunch-is-crowdsourcing-dead/#comment-44 john Tue, 13 May 2008 22:20:49 +0000 http://www.crowdsourcethis.com/2008/05/12/cambrian-house-vs-techcrunch-is-crowdsourcing-dead/#comment-44 Hmmm Sikorsky says that; "You missed http://mob4hire.com in your original post. Paul and his team launched this completely using the CH platform." yet the CEO says that: "Firstly, I would like to state that Mob4hire was launched entirely using members of the Cambrian House community but not with Cambrian House investment. Mob4Hire is not and has never been owned by Cambrian House in whole or in part. Mob4hire Inc. is a private corporation." so... is mob4hire a CH project? seems like there is a conection, but an altruistic one? CH helped build mob4hire for free. Doesn't make sense like the rest of the CH model. Sounds like another flip a dead company into a new one at a fraction theinvestment and pretend that it was a legitimate exit. Hmmm Sikorsky says that;

“You missed http://mob4hire.com in your original post. Paul and his team launched this completely using the CH platform.”

yet the CEO says that:

“Firstly, I would like to state that Mob4hire was launched entirely using members of the Cambrian House community but not with Cambrian House investment. Mob4Hire is not and has never been owned by Cambrian House in whole or in part. Mob4hire Inc. is a private corporation.”

so… is mob4hire a CH project? seems like there is a conection, but an altruistic one? CH helped build mob4hire for free. Doesn’t make sense like the rest of the CH model.

Sounds like another flip a dead company into a new one at a fraction theinvestment and pretend that it was a legitimate exit.

]]> By: Brenden http://www.crowdsourcethis.com/2008/05/12/cambrian-house-vs-techcrunch-is-crowdsourcing-dead/#comment-43 Brenden Tue, 13 May 2008 16:47:00 +0000 http://www.crowdsourcethis.com/2008/05/12/cambrian-house-vs-techcrunch-is-crowdsourcing-dead/#comment-43 Thank you for your response but since I have talked to Jasmine my self and she has said that it is untrue then I am going to believe my ears vs his. Thank you for your response but since I have talked to Jasmine my self and she has said that it is untrue then I am going to believe my ears vs his.

]]> By: Heldrazagine http://www.crowdsourcethis.com/2008/05/12/cambrian-house-vs-techcrunch-is-crowdsourcing-dead/#comment-42 Heldrazagine Tue, 13 May 2008 16:36:48 +0000 http://www.crowdsourcethis.com/2008/05/12/cambrian-house-vs-techcrunch-is-crowdsourcing-dead/#comment-42 Well the information has now been confirmed, and Jasmine Antonick has been revealed as the source of the information, including that the site will "dissolve in three months". You are obviously wrong and should fess up. Well the information has now been confirmed, and Jasmine Antonick has been revealed as the source of the information, including that the site will “dissolve in three months”. You are obviously wrong and should fess up.

]]> By: Brenden http://www.crowdsourcethis.com/2008/05/12/cambrian-house-vs-techcrunch-is-crowdsourcing-dead/#comment-41 Brenden Tue, 13 May 2008 04:32:39 +0000 http://www.crowdsourcethis.com/2008/05/12/cambrian-house-vs-techcrunch-is-crowdsourcing-dead/#comment-41 In this case I have to disagree. In this case I have to disagree.

]]> By: Heldrazagine http://www.crowdsourcethis.com/2008/05/12/cambrian-house-vs-techcrunch-is-crowdsourcing-dead/#comment-40 Heldrazagine Tue, 13 May 2008 02:21:28 +0000 http://www.crowdsourcethis.com/2008/05/12/cambrian-house-vs-techcrunch-is-crowdsourcing-dead/#comment-40 The NY Times article is from March 3rd. That's hardly valid information now. TechCrunch is pretty reputable. The NY Times article is from March 3rd. That’s hardly valid information now. TechCrunch is pretty reputable.

]]>